New Delhi: The Delhi High Court on Monday asked news channels as to what needs to be done to improve the current standards of news reportage, while remarking that people are “scared of the Fourth Estate and that Doordarshan era was much better”.
“People are scared about the Fourth Estate. Even if the issue regarding the privacy of public figures is diluted, you (news channels) cannot drag their personal lives into the public domain,” said Justice Rajiv Shakdhar.
The court added: “Black-and-white Doordarshan era was much better, I feel.”
The court also questioned the news channels about the mechanism to change the way news reporting is taking place nowadays. “Even trained and educated minds get affected by such consistently misreporting. You tell us how should we resolve this?” the court asked.
The remarks were made while the court was hearing a petition filed by four Bollywood associations and 34 producers to seek restraint on Republic TV and Times Now channels from making or publishing what they dubbed as “irresponsible, derogatory and defamatory” remarks against Hindi film industry and its members.
The bench stated that it’s not disallowing the news channels from covering news but is only asking them to pursue responsible journalism. “We’re not saying that you cannot cover such news but we are (only) asking you to carry out responsible journalism,” it said.
The court also warned the channels that if they don’t follow the Programme Code, it will have to “enforce” it.
The petitioners had urged the court to see that the defendants abide by the Programme Code under the Cable Television Networks Rules, 1994, and to withdraw, recall and take down all defamatory content published by them against Bollywood.
This comes in the wake of alleged use of words and expressions like “dirt”, “filth”, “scum” and “druggies”, “it is Bollywood where the dirt needs to be cleaned”, “all the perfumes of Arabia cannot take away the stench and the stink of this filth and scum of the underbelly of Bollywood”, “this is the dirtiest industry in the country”, and “cocaine and LSD drenched Bollywood” by these channels.
The privacy of members of Bollywood was getting invaded, the plea contended, and their reputations irreparably damaged by painting the entire industry as criminals seeped in drug culture. To be a part of Bollywood was painted as synonymous with criminal acts in the public imagination, the petitioners said.
While the court was hearing the matter through videoconference, petitioners’ counsel Rajiv Nayar submitted that it all started with the suicide of actor Sushant Singh Rajput, which became murder, then Bollywood became criminal, then drug peddlers and now ISI-linked. “This is the course of this defamation complaint,” he said.
He prayed that objectionable content be removed from the social media platforms like YouTube and Twitter. “What I want immediately is that the scurrilous stuff that has gone on Youtube and Twitter be removed immediately,” Nayar pleaded before the court.
Senior Advocate Akhil Sibal, who also appeared on behalf of Bollywood entities, submitted that there’s a disjunct between the normative idea of journalism and the work done by a certain section of TV media.
“Courts have traditionally, in the past, expressed the hope about self-regulation, auto-course correction. So they have been circumspect. But the point is — it (course correction) is not taking place,” he added.
Sibal argued that the Press cannot convict anyone. “Evidence is scrutinised by the court, not by the media channels,” he remarked.
“There is a statutory scheme under the Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, which these channels are bound to abide by,” he submitted.
The court questioned: “Why haven’t they (Bollywood celebs) become a party to this suit themselves? Since they are aggrieved, they should approach individually.” It said that this shows that these individuals are hesitant in claiming damages.
The High Court also questioned news channels what should be done to improve reporting standards. “If you are not exercising self-restraint, then what shall we do? Your undertaking before the courts are not working too,” the court observed.
“The black-and-white Doordarshan era was much better, I feel,” it added.
“People are scared about the Fourth Estate. Even if the issue regarding the privacy of public figures is diluted, you (news channels) cannot drag their personal lives into the public domain,” said Justice Rajiv Shakdhar.
The petitioners have urged the court to see that the defendants abide by the Programme Code under the Cable Television Networks Rules, 1994, and to withdraw, recall and take down all defamatory content published by them against Bollywood.
This comes in the wake of alleged use of words and expressions like “dirt”, “filth”, “scum” and “druggies”, “it is Bollywood where the dirt needs to be cleaned”, “all the perfumes of Arabia cannot take away the stench and the stink of this filth and scum of the underbelly of Bollywood”, “this is the dirtiest industry in the country”, and “cocaine- and LSD-drenched Bollywood” by these channels.
The privacy of members of Bollywood was getting invaded, the plea contended, and their reputations irreparably damaged as the entire industry was painted as criminals seeped in drug culture. To be a part of Bollywood was painted as synonymous with criminal acts in the public imagination, the petitioners said.
