Bengaluru: The Karnataka government is grappling with significant fiscal stress, exacerbated by its commitments under various ‘guarantee’ schemes. The latest Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) report has highlighted an emerging issue that could further strain the state’s finances: guarantees provided by the government for loans raised by state-owned enterprises, particularly in the power sector.

Government Guarantees and Fiscal Impact

According to the CAG report, the Karnataka government has provided guarantees amounting to Rs 52,335.74 crore for the borrowings of electricity supply companies and Karnataka Power Corporation Ltd. This substantial figure represents a significant potential risk to the state’s financial stability. The CAG has raised concerns that these guarantees could eventually translate into a major liability for the state, especially given the ongoing losses being incurred by these enterprises.

The timing of this warning is particularly critical as the Congress-led government in Karnataka is heavily investing in its flagship ‘guarantee’ schemes. This fiscal year alone, Rs 52,000 crore is allocated to these schemes, a sharp increase from the Rs 36,857 crore spent last year. The guarantees provided by the government are classified as “contingent liabilities” on the Consolidated Fund of the State, which means they could become an actual financial burden if the borrowers default on their loans.

Outstanding Guarantees and Fiscal Responsibility

The CAG’s report underscores the growing concern over the state’s outstanding guarantees. In the fiscal year 2022-23, the total outstanding guarantee amount reached Rs 38,356 crore, encompassing both principal and interest, for loans raised by 151 state-run institutions. Notably, the power sector accounted for the largest portion of these guarantees, followed by sectors such as irrigation, housing, cooperation, and transport.

Under the Karnataka Ceiling on Government Guarantees Act, 1999, the total outstanding guarantees as of April 1 of any year should not exceed 80% of the state’s revenue receipts from the second preceding year. Currently, the total guarantees stand at 30.59% of this limit, which, while below the prescribed threshold, still represents a significant commitment.

Investment in Loss-Making Companies

One of the key issues identified by the CAG is the government’s continued investment in loss-making enterprises. By March 2023, the state had invested Rs 72,799.77 crore in at least 145 firms, including state-run companies and cooperative banks. Of this investment, Rs 43,211 crore was allocated to entities experiencing substantial financial losses. The CAG highlighted that, up to the end of 2021-22, these companies had accumulated a cumulative loss of Rs 23,298.37 crore, with 51% of this loss attributed to electricity supply companies (escoms).

The financial health of these escoms is particularly concerning. Their significant losses pose a risk to the overall financial position of the state, adding pressure to an already strained fiscal environment.

Government’s Response and Future Measures

In response to these challenges, the Karnataka Finance Department has engaged the Boston Consulting Group to assess the situation and propose strategies for revitalising the loss-making companies. This initiative is aimed at finding viable solutions to reduce the financial strain and improve the overall health of these enterprises.

Additional Chief Secretary (Finance) LK Atheeq has indicated that, despite the potential risks, no guarantee provided by the government has been invoked to date. Guarantees are extended only to institutions whose funding sources are closely linked with government support, ensuring that these commitments are monitored and managed carefully.

Conclusion

The guarantees extended by the Karnataka government for state-owned enterprises, particularly in the power sector, present a complex challenge for the state’s fiscal management. With significant sums committed and the potential for these guarantees to become actual liabilities, the government faces a critical task of balancing its financial commitments with prudent fiscal management. As the state navigates these challenges, the focus will be on implementing effective strategies to manage and mitigate the risks associated with these guarantees.