Bengaluru: Actor Ranveer Singh has informed the Karnataka High Court that he is willing to file a revised affidavit of apology in connection with remarks linked to the depiction of Chamundi Devi in the film Kantara.
The submission was made before Justice M. Nagaprasanna during the hearing of a petition arising from the controversy. The court has adjourned the matter to April 23 for further proceedings.
Actor offers to rework apology
Senior Advocate Sajan Poovayya, appearing on behalf of Ranveer Singh, told the court that the actor had already submitted an affidavit expressing regret over his remarks. However, he is willing to revise the affidavit if required.
According to the initial affidavit, Singh stated that he did not realise at the time that his comments could hurt the sentiments of devotees. He emphasised that he respects all religions and traditions.
The counsel further informed the court that the actor had conveyed his “deepest regret and unconditional apology” and had also undertaken to visit the temple associated with the deity to offer prayers.
Complainant raises objections
The complainant, Prashanth Methal, questioned the sincerity of the apology, arguing that the affidavit did not adequately reflect genuine remorse.
He also informed the court that Rishab Shetty had earlier advised Singh against making such remarks. The complainant requested the court to direct the filing of a more appropriate and sincere affidavit.
In response, Singh’s counsel stated that he was open to discussing the wording of the apology with the complainant and submitting a revised version.
Remarks at film festival sparked row
The controversy stems from remarks made by Ranveer Singh during the International Film Festival of India held in Goa.
While praising Rishab Shetty for his performance in Kantara, Singh referred to the portrayal of Chamundi Devi using a term that later drew criticism. He also mimicked a scene from the film during his speech.
The remarks triggered backlash on social media, with many alleging that they were insensitive to religious sentiments.
Legal proceedings underway
Following the complaint, a Bengaluru magistrate ordered an investigation under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Based on this, an FIR was registered at High Grounds Police Station under provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita related to religious enmity, insult and public mischief.
Singh subsequently approached the Karnataka High Court, stating that his remarks were taken out of context and were intended only to appreciate the film and its performance.
He also maintained that there was no intention to hurt religious sentiments or create disharmony among communities.
Conclusion
The case highlights the sensitivity surrounding religious depictions in cinema and public discourse. With the actor willing to revise his apology, the court’s next hearing on April 23 is expected to determine the course of the matter.
The outcome may also set a precedent on how public figures address controversies involving cultural and religious sentiments.
