Hyderabad: The Telangana High Court has directed the state government to refrain from taking coercive action against former chief minister K Chandrasekhar Rao and others named in a judicial commission report on alleged irregularities in the Kaleshwaram lift irrigation project.
A division bench comprising Chief Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh and Justice G M Mohiuddin also stayed the operational use of the commission’s report for further proceedings.
Court flags violation of natural justice
The court observed that while the constitution of the commission was valid, its findings were problematic. It noted that the conclusions drawn were prejudicial to the petitioners and violated principles of natural justice.
The bench further pointed out that safeguards under the Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952, particularly Section 8B, were not adequately followed. This provision ensures that individuals likely to be affected by an inquiry are given a fair opportunity to present their case.
Relief for KCR and others
The petitions were filed by KCR, former irrigation minister T Harish Rao, senior IAS officer Smitha Sabharwal, and retired IAS officer S K Joshi.
Senior advocate Gandra Mohan Rao, representing KCR, argued that the commission’s report lacked legal standing. Following the court’s observations, he described the order as a “major relief” for his client.
Government’s stand and court observation
The state government had defended the commission, stating that it was constituted in public interest and followed due process. However, the court found fault with the manner in which the report’s findings were made public before legislative scrutiny.
At the same time, the bench clarified that the formation of the commission itself was neither arbitrary nor unconstitutional.
About the Kaleshwaram project
The Kaleshwaram Lift Irrigation Scheme is one of the world’s largest multi-stage lift irrigation projects. Initiated in 2016 under the BRS government, it was inaugurated in 2019.
In March 2024, the state government set up a commission headed by former Supreme Court judge Pinaki Chandra Ghose to probe alleged irregularities in the planning, construction and maintenance of key barrages, including Medigadda, Annaram and Sundilla.
The commission submitted its report in July 2025, holding several officials and political leaders accountable for lapses.
Political reactions
Reacting to the order, T Harish Rao termed the verdict a setback to the state government and alleged political motives behind the inquiry. K T Rama Rao also welcomed the decision, calling it validation of their claims.
On the other hand, state irrigation minister N Uttam Kumar Reddy clarified that the court had not given a clean chit to those named in the report. He said the government would review the judgment and decide its next course of action.
Conclusion
The High Court’s interim order offers temporary relief to KCR and others, while also raising questions about the inquiry process. The case is expected to continue, with further legal and political developments likely in the coming weeks.