News Karnataka
Thursday, December 01 2022
India

Not proved Salman was drunk or driving: Bombay HC

Photo Credit :

Mumbai: In what could turn into a major relief for Salman Khan in the controversial drunken-driving and hit-and-run case the Bombay High court said that it has not been proved by the prosecution that the actor had consumed liquor and that he was driving the Toyota Land Cruiser Lexus.

“This court has come to the conclusion that the prosecution has failed to bring material on record to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant-accused (Salman Khan) was driving and driving under the influence of alcohol, also, whether the accident occurred due to bursting (of tyre) prior to the incident or tyre burst after the incident…,” Justice A R Joshi said while dwelling on citations of the Bombay High Court and the Supreme Court on the Alister Pereira case and the applicability of section 304, Part II.

The court further said that it the statement of the police bodyguard Ravindra Patil, the first informant who lodged the FIR was also not entirely confirmed and expressed that the prosecution should have examined as a witness actor Kamaal Khan who was also in the car with the actor.

The dictation of the verdict on Salman Khan’s appeal is expected to end on Thursday.
On applicability and admissibility of statement of Patil, whose examination-in-chief and cross-examination was done in the Magistrate’s Court, Justice Joshi said: “When that was done, the case was being tried before the Metropolitan Magistrate’s Court under section 304 A (causing death by negligence), which attracts a maximum jail term of two years or fine or both, while when it was in Sessions Court, it was under Section 304, Part II (culpable homicide not amounting to murder), which attracts a jail term of maximum of 10 years and fine… the applicability of this evidence tendered before Magistrate’s Court under Section 33 of Indian Evidence Act cannot be taken as fulfilled in Sessions Court as the ingredients of the offence are different.”

On Patil’s statement, it said he has improved his statement significantly. “In the FIR on September 28, 2012, he has not said anything about alcohol, but he mentions this on October 1.”

 

Share this:
MANY DROPS MAKE AN OCEAN
Support NewsKarnataka's quality independent journalism with a small contribution.

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Visit 7Jackpots and find the best online casinos in India! Play the most popular casino games for real money!

Find the best odds at 10Cric and ipl betting 2021! Signup today and get up to a 100% deposit bonus.

To get the latest news on WhatsApp