Child marriage case reported at Anepalya mosque
Bengaluru police have registered a case following allegations that a 16-year-old girl was forced into marriage at a mosque in Anepalya on September 26, 2025. The complaint, filed by a government official, led authorities to act under relevant sections of the Child Marriage Restraint Act. The case was formally registered at Ashok Nagar police station on September 29.
Senior police officials stated that the complaint was received from a third party and subsequently referred to the Child Welfare Committee (CWC). “After receiving the report from the CWC, we have registered a case. Further action will be taken as per law,” a senior officer said.
Alleged perpetrators named in complaint
In a separate complaint, advocate Hussain Owais S wrote to DG&IGP MA Saleem and Bengaluru Police Commissioner Seemant Kumar Singh, highlighting what he termed an “illegal marriage.” The complaint named Sujat Ali, Hasan Raza, and Waqf Board member Mir Kaim (also referred to as Azan Jafari) as participants in conducting or facilitating the marriage.
The complaint emphasised that the marriage was in violation of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006, which prohibits marriage involving individuals below 18 years of age. It further highlighted that any sexual activity with a minor, even within marriage, would constitute rape under the POCSO Act (Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act).
Allegations of pregnancy under investigation
The complaint also stated that public reports suggested the minor might be pregnant. “This can only be confirmed through a proper medical examination,” the complaint added. Police and child welfare authorities are expected to conduct a medical assessment to ascertain the girl’s condition.
Officials have assured that the investigation will follow due legal procedure and that measures will be taken to protect the welfare of the minor, in line with the POCSO Act and Child Marriage Restraint Act.
Legal context and implications
Under the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006, anyone facilitating or conducting a child marriage can face imprisonment of up to two years or a fine. Additionally, sexual relations with a minor, even within a marriage, are punishable under the POCSO Act, with stringent penalties to protect children from sexual abuse.
Child rights activists have emphasised the need for prompt action in such cases. “Early intervention by police and child welfare authorities is crucial to prevent exploitation and protect the rights of minors,” said an advocate working with child protection organisations in Bengaluru.
Steps taken by authorities
The police have confirmed registration of the case and are awaiting the CWC report, which will guide further action. Meanwhile, authorities have also alerted healthcare professionals for a possible medical examination of the minor to determine her health status and any evidence of pregnancy.
Officials have reiterated that cases involving child marriage require a coordinated approach between law enforcement, child welfare bodies, and healthcare providers to ensure both legal compliance and the safety of the child.
Conclusion
The alleged forced marriage of a 16-year-old girl in Anepalya highlights ongoing concerns over child marriage in urban and semi-urban areas. Legal safeguards under the Child Marriage Restraint Act and POCSO Act are designed to protect minors, but enforcement and timely intervention remain critical. Authorities in Bengaluru have assured that a full investigation will be conducted, prioritising the welfare and protection of the minor while pursuing legal action against the alleged perpetrators.
