Mangaluru: Former minister Ramanath Rai has expressed disappointment over the breach of privilege motion moved by the Bantwal MLA in the Legislative Assembly, stating that development works carried out in a constituency through the district in-charge minister are a normal and accepted practice.
Addressing a press conference, Rai said that raising such an issue in the Assembly reflects a “narrow mindset” and unnecessarily politicises routine governance matters. He emphasised that securing funds for development, especially for Scheduled Caste colonies, should not be turned into a controversy.
‘Development through ministers is routine practice’
Elaborating on the issue, Rai pointed out that there is nothing unusual about undertaking development works in a constituency with the support of the government and its ministers. He stated that such coordination has been a long-standing administrative practice aimed at ensuring smooth implementation of projects.
According to him, bringing funds into a constituency should be seen as a positive step towards development rather than being questioned through legislative procedures like a breach of privilege motion.
He also criticised the decision to escalate the matter to the Assembly, suggesting that it diverts attention from more pressing public concerns.
Remarks on MLA development funds
Rai further highlighted recent changes in the allocation of funds under the MLA Local Area Development scheme. He noted that earlier, there were delays and challenges in sanctioning funds, but now each MLA is allocated Rs 10 crore.
He said this allocation empowers MLAs to independently undertake development works based on local needs and priorities. With such financial autonomy, Rai questioned the need to create disputes over how development initiatives are executed.
Questions raised over political messaging
The former minister also raised concerns about the use of political imagery in development-related works. Referring to the display of the Prime Minister’s photograph on cutouts for projects funded by the state government, Rai questioned the appropriateness of such practices.
He implied that development initiatives funded through public money should remain free from political branding, and should instead focus on public welfare and transparency.
Leaders attend press conference
Several local leaders were present at the press conference, showing support for Rai’s statements. Among those in attendance were Shashidhar Hegde, Shubhodaya Alva, Appi Dinesh Kumar, Suhan Alva, Ramananda Poojary, Fayaz, Ashok DK, Premananda Ballal Bagh, and Vikas Shetty.
Their presence highlighted the political significance of the issue and the support Rai commands among local leaders.
Conclusion
Rai’s remarks underline a broader debate on governance practices and the politicisation of development initiatives. While legislative mechanisms like breach of privilege motions are important tools, he suggested that their use in routine administrative matters may not be warranted.
The issue is likely to continue drawing attention as discussions around development funding, political messaging, and legislative conduct evolve in the state.