New Delhi: Former India head coach Rahul Dravid has sparked a significant debate in Indian cricket by expressing a viewpoint that contrasts with his successor Gautam Gambhir on the idea of “superstar culture.” While Gambhir has been vocal about reducing individual-centric prominence within the team, Dravid believes that the presence of heroes is essential for the sport’s growth and inspiration.

Dravid, who concluded his tenure on a high after India’s victorious 2024 T20 World Cup campaign, shared his thoughts during an interaction on Wisden’s Scoop podcast. He emphasised that star players are not manufactured but are the result of consistent performances under pressure, especially in a cricket-obsessed nation like India.

Heroes play a vital role in sport

According to Dravid, every sport thrives on the presence of icons who capture the imagination of fans and motivate aspiring players. He pointed out that becoming a superstar in India is not easy, given the intense scrutiny and expectations placed on cricketers.

Dravid noted that players earn their stature through impactful performances and contributions to team success. He highlighted that admiration from fans comes alongside criticism, making the journey to becoming a “hero” both challenging and meaningful.

His remarks subtly counter Gambhir’s approach, which prioritises a collective team identity over individual stardom. Gambhir has consistently advocated for removing the concept of “superstars” from the dressing room, aiming to build a unit where every player is treated equally.

A transition phase in Indian Test cricket

Dravid also addressed India’s recent struggles in Test cricket, attributing them partly to the absence of experienced stalwarts. The retirements of key players such as Virat Kohli, Rohit Sharma, and Ravichandran Ashwin have left a significant gap in the team’s red-ball setup.

He acknowledged that replacing players of such calibre is not an easy task and that the team is currently in a rebuilding phase. Despite recent underwhelming performances, Dravid expressed confidence in the strength of Indian cricket and its ability to recover.

He added that dips in form are natural in any team’s journey and should not overshadow the overall depth and talent present in Indian cricket.

Challenges of modern-day scheduling

Another important aspect highlighted by Dravid was the growing challenge of balancing multiple formats in contemporary cricket. With an increasingly packed international calendar, players often struggle to dedicate sufficient time to prepare for Test matches.

Dravid reiterated that Test cricket remains the most demanding and respected format among players, offering a unique sense of achievement. However, the dominance of white-ball cricket has reduced preparation windows, making it difficult for players to adapt effectively.

He compared the current scenario with his playing days, when there were fewer formats and more time to focus on red-ball cricket. According to him, today’s players are not lacking in intent but are constrained by scheduling demands.

A larger philosophical debate

The differing perspectives of Dravid and Gambhir underline a broader philosophical divide in modern cricket. On one hand, Gambhir’s vision promotes a team-first culture devoid of individual hierarchies. On the other, Dravid’s stance recognises the importance of star players in shaping the sport’s identity and appeal.

Both viewpoints carry merit, reflecting the evolving nature of cricket in India. While a strong team ethos is crucial for sustained success, the presence of inspirational figures often drives fan engagement and nurtures future talent.

Conclusion

As Indian cricket navigates a transitional period, finding the right balance between individual brilliance and collective strength will be key. Dravid’s remarks serve as a reminder that heroes and team spirit need not be mutually exclusive but can coexist to strengthen the sport.