The Supreme Court of India on Friday (October 10, 2025) dismissed a public interest litigation (PIL) seeking an independent judicial or expert probe into the recent cough syrup deaths in Madhya Pradesh, which have claimed the lives of 22 children.

Petition for independent investigation

The PIL, filed by advocate Vishal Tiwari, sought the constitution of either a judicial commission or an expert committee to investigate the deaths and hold responsible parties accountable. The petition highlighted concerns over alleged lapses in regulatory oversight and medical safety protocols that might have contributed to the tragedy.

During the proceedings, the Bench comprising Chief Justice of India B.R. Gavai and Justice K. Vinod Chandran questioned the petitioner about the number of PILs he had filed in his legal career, signalling the court’s reservations about the filing. The Bench ultimately dismissed the plea, bringing the short-lived petition to an end.

Background of the tragedy

The cough syrup deaths in Madhya Pradesh have shaken public confidence in the pharmaceutical regulatory system. The incident involved children who reportedly consumed contaminated cough syrup, leading to fatal outcomes. In response, state authorities had already launched an investigation through local agencies, and preliminary reports suggested lapses in quality control.

Despite public outcry and demands for a more independent probe, the Supreme Court opted not to intervene at this stage, emphasizing procedural concerns over the filing of repetitive or similar petitions by the same advocate.

Legal and public reactions

The dismissal of the PIL has been met with mixed reactions. Legal experts noted that while the Supreme Court’s decision does not prevent other petitions from being filed, it underscores the importance of judicial restraint when considering public interest litigations. Meanwhile, public health advocates continue to urge both state and central authorities to ensure strict pharmaceutical regulation and accountability to prevent future tragedies.

The Madhya Pradesh government has reportedly strengthened oversight of cough syrup manufacturing and distribution, with a focus on quality assurance, batch testing, and stricter licensing norms. Medical experts have also emphasised the need for heightened vigilance among paediatricians and pharmacists to identify potentially harmful batches of medication promptly.

Conclusion

While the Supreme Court has dismissed the PIL seeking an independent probe into the cough syrup deaths, the tragedy continues to highlight concerns over drug safety, regulatory enforcement, and accountability. Authorities are under pressure to implement robust measures to prevent similar incidents, and public attention remains sharply focused on the safety of medicines consumed by children