Washington: Donald Trump is unlikely to accept Iran’s latest proposal aimed at resolving the ongoing West Asia conflict, as it does not meet Washington’s core demand of addressing Tehran’s nuclear programme upfront, according to reports citing US officials.
The development marks a fresh setback for diplomatic efforts, with both sides remaining divided on how to structure negotiations to end hostilities and restore regional stability.
Disagreement over sequencing of talks
Iran’s proposal outlines a phased approach to resolving the crisis. It suggests first securing a ceasefire and guarantees against renewed conflict, followed by resolving maritime tensions—particularly in the Strait of Hormuz—and reopening key shipping routes.
Only in the later stages does Tehran propose addressing contentious issues such as its nuclear programme and uranium enrichment rights.
However, US officials have rejected this sequencing. They insist that Iran’s nuclear ambitions must be addressed at the outset of any agreement, viewing it as central to long-term security.
US stance on nuclear issue
A senior US official briefed on discussions said President Trump has made it clear that separating the nuclear issue from broader negotiations is unacceptable.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio reinforced this position, stating that any agreement must ensure Iran is permanently prevented from developing nuclear weapons.
Washington has consistently cited Iran’s nuclear capabilities as a primary reason for its hardline approach, arguing that delaying the issue could undermine the effectiveness of any peace deal.
Diplomatic efforts hit a roadblock
The disagreement has further dimmed hopes for immediate diplomatic progress. Planned talks in Islamabad were called off after the US cancelled a visit by envoy Steve Witkoff and adviser Jared Kushner.
Meanwhile, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi has been engaging in diplomatic outreach, travelling to countries including Pakistan, Oman, and Russia. During his visit to Russia, he held talks with Vladimir Putin, a key ally of Tehran.
Clash at global nuclear forum
Tensions between the US and Iran were also evident at the review conference of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), where disputes arose over Iran’s appointment as one of the vice-presidents.
The US, backed by countries such as Australia, the UAE, the UK, France, and Germany, opposed the move, expressing strong objections. In contrast, Russia defended Iran and criticised efforts to single it out.
Iran’s envoy Reza Najafi dismissed the criticism as politically motivated.
Impact on global trade and oil markets
The ongoing tensions have significantly affected global trade, particularly in the Strait of Hormuz, a crucial route through which nearly one-fifth of the world’s oil supply passes.
Iran has accused the US of “piracy” over the seizure of its oil shipments, while indicating it could ease restrictions in the strait if the blockade is lifted and hostilities end.
The disruption has led to a sharp rise in oil prices, with tanker traffic in the region dropping drastically. Recent data shows only a handful of vessels passing through the strait daily, compared to over 100 before the conflict escalated.
Conclusion
With both sides firmly holding their positions, the latest impasse underscores the challenges of resolving the West Asia conflict through diplomacy. The US insistence on prioritising nuclear concerns and Iran’s demand for a phased approach have created a significant gap in negotiations.
Unless a compromise is reached, tensions are likely to persist, with wider implications for regional stability and global energy markets.