The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) is embroiled in a controversy triggered by English cricket legends Nasser Hussain and Mike Atherton. Both former cricketers argued that the Indian team was granted a distinct advantage by having all their Champions Trophy matches hosted at a single venue—Dubai.
Notably, political tensions and security concerns prevented Team India from traveling to Pakistan for the tournament. As a result, the International Cricket Council (ICC) arranged all Indian games to be played in Dubai, which led to much debate about the fairness of this arrangement.
In response to this, former Pakistani cricketer Inzamam-ul-Haq suggested that global cricket boards should boycott the Indian Premier League (IPL) as a form of protest. He pointed out the disparity where Indian players are not allowed to play in overseas leagues, while international players are welcome in the IPL. “If the BCCI doesn’t release players for other leagues, other boards should stop sending players to IPL,” Inzamam commented on a Pakistani TV channel.
The controversy intensified as both Australia and South Africa flew to Dubai ahead of their potential semifinal clash with India. With the group stages still underway, the outcome of India’s match against New Zealand will determine whether India faces Australia or South Africa in the semifinals. Both teams are keen on gaining an edge by practicing in Dubai before their knockout match.
As tensions continue to rise, questions about fair play and the power dynamics within international cricket remain at the forefront.
Read also: